Insertion of a Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent for the Prevention of Urological Complications in Renal Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized Study

G Benoît, P. Blanchet, P. Eschwege, L Alexandre, H. Bensadoun, Bruno Charpentier

The Journal of Urology · 1996 · 146 citations · 37 references

Concepts

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urologists successfully use ureteral stents to protect the ureterovesical anastomosis in nontransplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the value of ureteral stents in transplant patients. The frequency of urological complications (leaks, obstructions and urinary tract infections) was compared in a prospective randomized series of 194 kidney transplantations (97 with and 97 without a double pigtail ureteral stent). RESULTS: In the stent group 1 patient had a urinary leak and 35 had urinary tract infections (including 2 cases of Corynebacterium cystitis). In the no stent group 6 patients had urinary leaks, 4 had obstructions and 32 had urinary tract infections. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar in both groups, and renal function at 1 year was also similar (229 versus 208 mumol./l. creatinine in the stent and no stent groups, respectively). A small number of stent related complications occurred (2 stent breakages and 1 stent migration). No stones formed in any case. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stent insertion significantly decreases the rate of vesicoureteral leakage and obstruction in renal transplantation.

References

37