Comparison of SNR image quality metrics for remote sensing systems

Unknown author(s)

Optical Engineering · 2001 · 85 citations · 5 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Remote sensing image quality is often quantified by SNR, but multiple definitions exist and it is unclear which one is used when an SNR value is reported. The study examines several SNR metrics employed by the remote sensing community. The authors simulated images from a Kodak Space Remote Sensing Camera at varying signal levels, quantified interpretability with the NIIRS, and used the resulting linear relationship between interpretability loss and noise‑equivalent change in reflection to predict the SNR thresholds needed to avoid interpretability degradation. The analysis demonstrates that interpretability loss follows a linear relationship with noise‑equivalent change in reflection, enabling prediction of the SNR values required to maintain acceptable image interpretability. © 2001 Society of Photo‑Optical.

Abstract

Different definitions of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are be- ing used as metrics to describe the image quality of remote sensing systems. It is usually not clear which SNR definition is being used and what the image quality of the system is when an SNR value is quoted. This paper looks at several SNR metrics used in the remote sensing community. Image simulations of the Kodak Space Remote Sensing Camera, Model 1000, were produced at different signal levels to give insight into the image quality that corresponds with the different SNR metric values. The change in image quality of each simulation at different signal levels is also quantified using the National Imagery Interpretability Rating Scale (NIIRS) and related to the SNR metrics to better under- stand the relationship between the metric and image interpretability. An analysis shows that the loss in image interpretability, measured as DNI- IRS, can be modeled as a linear relationship with the noise-equivalent change in reflection (NE Dr). This relationship is used to predict the val- ues that the various SNR metrics must exceed to prevent a loss in the interpretability of the image from the noise. © 2001 Society of Photo-Optical

References

5