Confronting “Culture” in Medicineʼs “Culture of No Culture”

TLDR

Medicine’s institutional culture is portrayed as a “culture of no culture,” fostering static, essentialist views of culture that undermine genuine cultural competence in medical education. The study argues that true cultural competence requires dissolving the dichotomy between “real” and “cultural” and suggests that curricula will succeed only when medical competence itself becomes inherently cultural.

Abstract

The author presents reflections from medical anthropology on the institutional culture of medicine and medical education, which sees itself as a "culture of no culture" and which systematically tends to foster static and essentialist conceptions of "culture" as applied to patients. Even though requirements designed to address cultural competence are increasingly incorporated into medical school curricula, medical students as a group may be forgiven for failing to take these very seriously as long as they perceive that they are quite distinct from the real competence that they need to acquire. To change this situation will require challenging the tendency to assume that "real" and "cultural" must be mutually exclusive terms. Physicians' medical knowledge is no less cultural for being real, just as patients' lived experiences and perspectives are no less real for being cultural. Whether this lesson can be effectively conveyed within existing curricular frameworks remains an open question. Cultural competence curricula will, perhaps, achieve their greatest success if and when they put themselves out of business-if and when, that is, medical competence itself is transformed to such a degree that it is no longer possible to imagine it as not also being "cultural."