Publication | Closed Access
A Comparison of Four Procedures for Multiple Comparisons among Means (Pairwise Contrasts) for Arbitrary Sample Sizes
145
Citations
18
References
1976
Year
Comparative TestEducationPsychometricsQuasi-experimentClassical Test TheoryArbitrary Sample SizesPsychologyMethodology ComparisonStatistical ComputingApplied MeasurementBiostatisticsMultiple ComparisonsPublic HealthSample SizesStatisticsMaximum ModulusModel ComparisonStatistical ReviewPreference RulesStatistical InferencePairwise Contrasts
For the situation in which the contrasts of interest are limited to the pairwise comparisons among the means of K samples of equal or unequal sizes, four normal univariate single-stage multiple comparison procedures are compared for significance levels not exceeding 0.05: Scheffe's S-method, Dunn's (1, 2] and sidak's [17] improved version of the Bonferroni method, Hochberg's GT2 procedure [8] utilizing the maximum modulus, and Spjovoll and Stoline's T′-method [19]. Rules are given for determining if any method is uniformly preferable (best for all contrasts). Nonuniform preference rules are also proposed and applied to some examples. Auxiliary tables are provided for selecting a method for significance levels 0.01 and 0.05 for several values of v, the number of degrees of freedom of an independent variance estimate, and K. It is shown that the T′-method is uniformly preferable when the sample sizes are “nearly” equal, while one of the other methods will be uniformly preferable when all sample sizes are “s...
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1