Influence of wheel configuration on wheelchair basketball performance: Wheel stiffness, tyre type and tyre orientation

Barry S. Mason, Marrit Lemstra, L.H.V. van der Woude, Riemer J. K. Vegter, Victoria L. Goosey‐Tolfrey

Medical Engineering & Physics · 2015 · 32 citations · 14 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

The aim of the current investigation was to explore the lateral stiffness of different sports wheelchair wheels available to athletes in ‘new’ and ‘used’ conditions and to determine the effect of (a) stiffness, (b) tyre type (clincher vs. tubular) and (c) tyre orientation on the physiological and biomechanical responses to submaximal and maximal effort propulsion specific to wheelchair basketball. Eight able-bodied individuals participated in the laboratory-based testing, which took place on a wheelchair ergometer at two fixed speeds (1.1 and 2.2 m s −1 ). Outcome measures were power output and physiological demand (oxygen uptake and heart rate). Three participants with experience of over-ground sports wheelchair propulsion also performed 2 × 20 m sprints in each wheel configuration. Results revealed that wheels differed significantly in lateral stiffness with the ‘new’ Spinergy wheel shown to be the stiffest (678.2 ± 102.1 N mm −1 ). However the effects of stiffness on physiological demand were minimal compared to tyre type whereby tubular tyres significantly reduced the rolling resistance and power output in relation to clincher tyres. Therefore tyre type (and subsequently inflation pressure) remains the most important aspect of wheel specification for athletes to consider and monitor when configuring a sports wheelchair. • Wheels currently available to wheelchair sportsmen/women do differ in lateral stiffness. • Differences in wheel stiffness had little impact on the physiological demand of submaximal wheelchair propulsion. • Tyre type and subsequent inflation pressure had the biggest effect on performance, with a reduction in rolling resistance and power output observed in tubular tyres, which resulted in a reduced physiological demand. • A tubular tyre with an innovative tyre orientation designed to minimise tyre deformation and rolling resistance demonstrated no further performance benefits in relation to a standard tubular tyre.

References

14