Authoritarian Governance, Power, and the Politics of Rescaling

E Swyngedouw

Environment and Planning D Society and Space · 2000 · 578 citations · 23 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper addresses five interrelated themes. The study critically examines the globalisation discourse and argues that greater attention to spatial scale is needed to transform deterritorialisation into an emancipatory process. The author analyzes how the globalisation myth frames ideological struggles, revives local scale, and dominates rhetoric, thereby obscuring spatial governance conflicts and underscoring the need for spatial scale analysis to counter deterritorialisation. The rhetoric of globalisation facilitates the rise of authoritarian or autocratic governance.

Abstract

In this paper I critically assess the alleged process of globalisation of the world economy. Five interrelated themes are addressed. First, I argue that the ‘real’ myth of the globalisation discourse is part of an intensifying ideological, political, socioeconomic, and cultural struggle over the organisation of society and the position of the citizen therein. Second, the ‘mythical’ resurrection of the ‘local’ or ‘regional’ scale—both in theory and in practice—is an integral part of the ‘myth’ of globalisation. Third, the preeminence of the ‘global’ in much of the literature and political rhetoric obfuscates, marginalises, and silences an intense and ongoing sociospatial struggle in which the reconfiguration of spatial scales of governance takes a central position. Fourth, the ‘rhetoric’ of globalisation is paralleled by and facilitates the emergence of more authoritarian or at least autocratic forms of governance. Fifth, the proliferation of new modes and forms of resistance to the restless process of deterritorialisation-reterritorialisation of capital requires greater attention to ‘spatial scale’ in order to assess how the emerging new ‘gestalt of scale’ could be turned into an emancipatory and empowering process.

References

23