Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2010 · 21 citations · 53 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgerySurgeryBiomaterialsBone GraftingTissue EngineeringAllograft ReconstructionBone Graft IntegrationBone Tissue EngineeringOsteochondral Allograft TransplantationOsteochondral Autograft TransferOsteochondral GraftingAllograft Osteochondral TransplantationCryopreserved AllograftsFresh Frozen Bone AllograftFresh-frozen AllograftsFresh-frozen Osteochondral AllograftsFrozen Osteochondral AllograftGraft CryopreservationOsteochondral Graft Integration
PURPOSE: To compare the integration of osteochondral allografts cryopreserved at different temperatures and different concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide in an in vivo sheep animal model. METHODS: Thirty-six adult sheep were randomly allocated to 6 groups of allograft osteochondral transplantation. Six osteochondral cylinders were stored for 6 weeks at -80°C; 6 at -80°C with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO); 6 at -80°C with 10% DMSO for 90 min; 6 at -186°C; 6 at -186°C with 10% DMSO; 6 at -186°C for 90 min. After transplantation, all animals were euthanized at 6 months. Harvested specimens underwent gross morphologic and histologic evaluation. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant differences when comparing the gross cartilage morphology and histopathologic scores of each group. The Mankin and OARSI scores and the modified Wakitani and OARSI scores showed a good correlation grade. The Mankin and modified Wakitani scores showed a fair correlation grade. CONCLUSION: The cryopreservation protocols adopted in the present study provided scanty integration in an in vivo sheep model of osteochondral allograft transplantation. Therefore, their use in the clinical practice is discouraged.
53
HISTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF CARTILAGE REPAIR
Pierre Mainil‐Varlet, Thomas Aigner, Mats Brittberg et al. · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · 2003 · 567 citations
Erhan Basad, Bernd Ishaque, Georg Bachmann et al. · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2010 · 399 citations