Concepedia

Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults

Mohammad M. Al‐Qattan, Jelena Djordjević, Alexei I. Zhurov, Stephen Richmond

European Journal of Orthodontics · 2013 · 68 citations · 34 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Facial asymmetry can be accurately quantified using landmark- and surface-based approaches. The latter offers a more comprehensive analysis of the face.

References

34

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

J Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman · The Lancet · 1986 · 47K citations

, , +9

The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina

Alex Jacobson · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 1998 · 332 citations

, , +5

Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces.

Sheldon Peck, Leena Peck, Matti Kataja · PubMed · 1991 · 287 citations

, , +13

Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management.

You-Wei Cheong, Lun‐Jou Lo · PubMed · 2012 · 282 citations

, , +14

Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications

Budi Kusnoto, Carla A. Evans · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2002 · 213 citations

, , +8