Spontaneous Succession versus Technical Reclamation in the Restoration of Disturbed Sites

Karel Prach, Richard J. Hobbs

Restoration Ecology · 2008 · 425 citations · 24 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates when spontaneous succession suffices versus when technical measures are required in restoration programs. The authors assess sites along a productivity–stress gradient to determine restoration strategy suitability. Spontaneous succession is less likely to achieve target stages at both high and low ends of the gradient, while technical measures become more accepted and costly there, so it is recommended when site conditions are moderate.

Abstract

Abstract We address the question: under which circumstances can we rely upon spontaneous succession and when are technical measures more effective in restoration programs? To answer this question, the position of a disturbed site along the productivity–stress gradient was considered. The probability of attaining a target stage by spontaneous succession decreases toward both ends of the productivity–stress gradient, whereas the acceptance of technical measures generally increases. In correspondence with that, the monetary cost of restoration increases toward the ends of the gradient. Therefore, spontaneous succession is advocated especially if environmental site conditions are not very extreme.

References

24