Publication | Closed Access
Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Buried Sutures for Primary Cleft Lip Repair
14
Citations
0
References
1996
Year
Tissue EngineeringCleft LipEngineeringSoft Tissue SurgeryNonabsorbable Buried SuturesMonofilament NylonReconstructive SurgeryPalate SurgeryCleft Lip RepairSurgeryWound HealingBiomedical EngineeringDermatologySoft Tissue ReconstructionMedicineStitch AbscessesPlastic SurgeryCosmetic Appearance
Absorbable and nonabsorbable buried sutures were studied in primary cleft lip repair. Group 1 (N = 56) consisted of patients repaired with buried nonabsorbable material (monofilament nylon). Group 2 (N = 47) consisted of patients repaired with absorbable materials (polyglyconate, polydioxanone). All patients were monitored for 12 months. There were stitch abscesses in Group 1 (14%). There were no abscesses in Group 2. This difference was significant (p = 0.007). Abscesses were located in the suture line with no identifiable distribution. There was no significant difference in the cosmetic appearance of the scars in Groups 1 and 2. These results support the view that absorbable sutures are preferable to nonabsorbable sutures for primary cleft lip repair.