1998 · 166 citations · 24 references
MedicineEmergency MedicineSurgeryEmergency SurgeryTrauma CareUltrasonographyAbdominal ImagingAbdominal TraumaAbdominal UltrasonographyEmergency UltrasoundTrauma AssessmentTrauma SurgeryAbdominal Penetrating TraumaAbdominal Trauma SurgeryAbdominal Trauma UltrasoundBlunt Abdominal InjuryBlunt Trauma Imaging
BACKGROUND: In the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma, the reliability of ultrasonography (US) in identifying individual organ injuries remains uncertain, in spite of its usefulness in detecting hemoperitoneum. This study was designed to evaluate the overall diagnostic value of US, including identification of individual organ injuries. METHODS: The accuracy of US in the detection of intra-abdominal injuries and the identification of individual organ injuries was evaluated in 1,239 patients seen during a 15-year period. Accuracy was based on detection of intraperitoneal fluid, free air, or irregular parenchymal lesions. RESULTS: For the detection of injuries, US was 94.6% sensitive, 95.1% specific, and 94.9% accurate. Individual organ injuries were identified with sensitivities of 92.4, 90.0, 92.2, 71.4, and 34.7% for the liver, spleen, kidneys, pancreas, and intestine, respectively. CONCLUSION: US is reliable for the detection of injuries and the identification of solid-organ injuries despite its poor sensitivity for intestinal injuries.
24
SONOGRAPHY IN BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA
Paul L. Tso, Aurelio Rodríguez, Carnell Cooper et al. · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · 1992 · 267 citations
Reinhard Hoffmann, Michael Nerlich, Michael Muggia‐Sullam et al. · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · 1992 · 252 citations
1,000 Consecutive Ultrasounds for Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Mark McKenney, Larry Martin, Kimberley A. Lentz et al. · 1996 · 251 citations