Robertsonian translocations: An overview of a 30-year experience in a single tertiary medical center in Taiwan

Yi-Wen Chang, Ling-Chao Chen, Chih-Yao Chen, Chang-Ching Yeh, Ling-Yi Cheng, Yu‐Ling Lai, Yung-Yung Cheng, Wen-Hsun Chang, Kuan-Chin Wang, Wai Hou Li,

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association · 2013 · 16 citations · 17 references

Concepts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advanced maternal age (AMA) is the most frequent indication for amniocentesis in predicting balanced reciprocal translocations, and abnormal ultrasound findings are indications in predicting unbalanced reciprocal translocations; however, to date, no studies have focused on Robertsonian translocations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 16,749 pregnant women who underwent midtrimester amniocentesis between January 1981 and December 2010. Robertsonian translocations were identified in 39 cases. RESULTS: The percentage of Robertsonian translocations in all amniocentesis cases was 0.23% (39/16,749); 31 were balanced and eight were unbalanced. De novo abnormality occurred in 17 cases, or in 43.6% of all Robertsonian translocations. The two major indications for amniocentesis with a diagnosis of Robertsonian translocations were AMA (41.0%, n = 16) and a parent with abnormal karyotypes (18.0%, n = 7). The highest percentage of Robertsonian translocations was found in parents with abnormal karyotypes (2.8%, 7/252), but neither of the indications were clearly superior for detecting de novo Robertsonian translocations. CONCLUSION: Although AMA is an indication for amniocentesis in approximately two-fifths of cases with Robertsonian translocations, the indication of parent with abnormal karyotypes was more likely to lead to the detection of non-de novo Robertsonian translocations, suggesting that parents with abnormal karyotypes need careful prenatal consultation.

References

17