Publication | Closed Access
Understanding Health Literacy for Strategic Health Marketing: eHealth Literacy, Health Disparities, and the Digital Divide
316
Citations
56
References
2008
Year
Health DisparitiesSocial Determinants Of HealthHealth InequalityHealth CommunicationHealthcare MarketingDigital HealthManagementPublic HealthHealth Services ResearchHealth EducationHealth PolicyStrategic Health MarketingHealth PromotionE-health ServiceEhealthHealth EquityHealth LiteracyMarketingHealth Information TechnologyHealth CampaignsEhealth LiteracyHealth Disparity
Despite policy efforts, population-level gaps in literacy and healthcare quality are widening and are likely to worsen as reliance on internet-based health information grows. The article aims to integrate health literacy into an Integrative Model of eHealth Use. The authors propose that macro‑level social disparities influence health disparities through micro‑level eHealth literacy, motivation, and ability, with structural inequities perpetuating themselves via unequal technology distribution that both enhances and impedes these factors. The article concludes with pragmatic implications derived from this analysis.
Even despite policy efforts aimed at reducing health-related disparities, evidence mounts that population-level gaps in literacy and healthcare quality are increasing. This widening of disparities in American culture is likely to worsen over the coming years due, in part, to our increasing reliance on Internet-based technologies to disseminate health information and services. The purpose of the current article is to incorporate health literacy into an Integrative Model of eHealth Use. We argue for this theoretical understanding of eHealth literacy and propose that macro-level disparities in social structures are connected to health disparities through the micro-level conduits of eHealth literacy, motivation, and ability. In other words, structural inequities reinforce themselves and continue to contribute to healthcare disparities through the differential distribution of technologies that simultaneously enhance and impede literacy, motivation, and ability of different groups (and individuals) in the population. We conclude the article by suggesting pragmatic implications of our analysis.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1