Journal of Advanced Nursing · 1994 · 378 citations · 18 references
NursingAdvanced Practice NursingEvidence-based PracticeNurse Practitioner PracticeNursing Knowledge ManagementMixed-methods ResearchQualitative AnalysisQualitative Research AppraisalQualitative Research MethodsQuantitative Research MethodsNursing EthicsNursing Knowledge StructuresQualitative Data CollectionQualitative Rigour
The overall purpose of research for any profession is to discover the truth of the discipline. This paper examines the controversy over the methods by which truth is obtained, by examining the differences and similarities between quantitative and qualitative research. The historically negative bias against qualitative research is discussed, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, with issues highlighted by reference to nursing research. Consideration is given to issues of sampling; the relationship between the researcher and subject; methodologies and collated data; validity; reliability, and ethical dilemmas. The author identifies that neither approach is superior to the other; qualitative research appears invaluable for the exploration of subjective experiences of patients and nurses, and quantitative methods facilitate the discovery of quantifiable information. Combining the strengths of both approaches in triangulation, if time and money permit, is also proposed as a valuable means of discovering the truth about nursing. It is argued that if nursing scholars limit themselves to one method of enquiry, restrictions will be placed on the development of nursing knowledge.
18
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
Margarete Sandelowski · Advances in Nursing Science · 1986 · 2.8K citations
The Practice of Nursing Research: Conduct, Critique and Utilization
Janet Cozad · AORN Journal · 1989 · 1.6K citations
West Berkshire perineal management trial.
Jennifer Sleep, Adrian Grant, Jorge García et al. · BMJ · 1984 · 428 citations · Full text
Medicine, Obstetrics, Surgery +14