Publication | Closed Access
The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): A measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users
345
Citations
21
References
2009
Year
Family MedicineCustomer SatisfactionQuality Of LifePsychiatric EvaluationMeasurement ToolMental Health InterventionMental HealthInternal ConsistencyConstruct ValidityReliabilityPsychiatryService RecoveryRehabilitationClinical PsychiatryRehabilitation ProcessService UsersPsychosocial RehabilitationCommunity Mental HealthFunctional RecoveryRecovery SupportMedicinePatient ExperiencePsychopathologyShort Recovery Questionnaire
To develop and validate a short recovery questionnaire in collaboration with service users. The study recruited 126 individuals with psychosis through NHS trusts and self‑help organisations, generated a 25‑item questionnaire from in‑depth recovery interviews, refined it to a 22‑item QPR, and evaluated its reliability and construct validity by factor analysis and comparison with GHQ, MDES, and SQLS, with a two‑week retest for stability. The QPR consists of intrapersonal and interpersonal subscales, shows satisfactory internal consistency and reliability, correlates strongly with GHQ, MDES, and SQLS, and remains stable over two weeks, indicating it is a valid and reliable tool for facilitating goal setting and recovery assessment in psychosis.
Aims: To develop and validate a short recovery questionnaire in collaboration with service users. Method: 126 people with experience of psychosis were recruited via the National Health Service (NHS) Trust and self‐help organisations nationwide. Items were generated from in‐depth interviews into recovery and developed into a 25‐item self‐report questionnaire. Data were factor analysed, and a final 22‐item measure (the QPR) was tested for reliability and validity. To assess validity the QPR was administered together with measures of: psychological distress (the General Health Questionnaire – GHQ); empowerment (the Making Decisions and Empowerment Scale – MDES), and quality of life (the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale – SQLS). The QPR was administered again at two weeks to assess reliability. Results: The QPR is comprised of two subscales (intrapersonal and interpersonal). Internal consistency and reliability of the scale was satisfactory. There was a high level of association with MDES, GHQ and SQLS scores, and between QPR scores at time one and time two. Conclusions: The QPR possesses internal consistency, construct validity and reliability, and promises to be a useful tool for assisting clients to set goals, evaluation of these goals and promoting recovery from psychosis in routine service evaluation and research trials.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1