Pathway Thermodynamics Highlights Kinetic Obstacles in Central Metabolism

TLDR

Thermodynamics in metabolism is traditionally used to predict reaction directionality, but it also governs reaction kinetics via the flux‑force relationship, requiring disproportionately higher enzyme levels for reactions near equilibrium. The study introduces a framework to quantify how thermodynamic constraints limit pathway flux. The authors compute a Max‑min Driving Force metric for each pathway, incorporating pH, ionic strength, and metabolite concentration ranges, to rank pathways by thermodynamic constraint and assess structural modifications. When applied to central metabolic pathways, the method reveals bypasses, substrate channeling, and alternative cofactors, providing engineers a straightforward tool to evaluate the thermodynamic and kinetic quality of competing pathway chemistries.

Abstract

In metabolism research, thermodynamics is usually used to determine the directionality of a reaction or the feasibility of a pathway. However, the relationship between thermodynamic potentials and fluxes is not limited to questions of directionality: thermodynamics also affects the kinetics of reactions through the flux-force relationship, which states that the logarithm of the ratio between the forward and reverse fluxes is directly proportional to the change in Gibbs energy due to a reaction (ΔrG'). Accordingly, if an enzyme catalyzes a reaction with a ΔrG' of -5.7 kJ/mol then the forward flux will be roughly ten times the reverse flux. As ΔrG' approaches equilibrium (ΔrG' = 0 kJ/mol), exponentially more enzyme counterproductively catalyzes the reverse reaction, reducing the net rate at which the reaction proceeds. Thus, the enzyme level required to achieve a given flux increases dramatically near equilibrium. Here, we develop a framework for quantifying the degree to which pathways suffer these thermodynamic limitations on flux. For each pathway, we calculate a single thermodynamically-derived metric (the Max-min Driving Force, MDF), which enables objective ranking of pathways by the degree to which their flux is constrained by low thermodynamic driving force. Our framework accounts for the effect of pH, ionic strength and metabolite concentration ranges and allows us to quantify how alterations to the pathway structure affect the pathway's thermodynamics. Applying this methodology to pathways of central metabolism sheds light on some of their features, including metabolic bypasses (e.g., fermentation pathways bypassing substrate-level phosphorylation), substrate channeling (e.g., of oxaloacetate from malate dehydrogenase to citrate synthase), and use of alternative cofactors (e.g., quinone as an electron acceptor instead of NAD). The methods presented here place another arrow in metabolic engineers' quiver, providing a simple means of evaluating the thermodynamic and kinetic quality of different pathway chemistries that produce the same molecules.