Publication | Closed Access
A comparison of signal processing front ends for automatic word recognition
119
Citations
17
References
1995
Year
Speech SciencesEngineeringSpeech EnhancementWord Error RateCorpus LinguisticsSpeech RecognitionNatural Language ProcessingSpeech CodingPattern RecognitionText RecognitionComputational LinguisticsNoiseRobust Speech RecognitionAutomatic RecognitionCharacter RecognitionAcoustic AnalysisSpeech Signal AnalysisClean SpeechHealth SciencesAuditory ProcessingOptical Character RecognitionSignal Processing FrontComputer ScienceSignal ProcessingSpeech CommunicationSpeech TechnologySpeech AcousticsLanguage RecognitionAutomatic Word RecognitionSpeech ProcessingSpeech InputSpeech PerceptionLinguisticsCepstral Front End
This paper compares the word error rate of a speech recognizer using several signal processing front ends based on auditory properties. Front ends were compared with a control mel filter bank (MFB) based cepstral front end in clean speech and with speech degraded by noise and spectral variability, using the TI-105 isolated word database. MFB recognition error rates ranged from 0.5 to 26.9% in noise, depending on the SNR, and auditory models provided error rates as much as four percentage points lower. With speech degraded by linear filtering, MFB error rates ranged from 0.5 to 3.1%, and the reduction in error rates provided by auditory models was less than 0.5 percentage points. Some earlier studies that demonstrated considerably more improvement with auditory models used linear predictive coding (LPC) based control front ends. This paper shows that MFB cepstra significantly outperform LPC cepstra under noisy conditions. Techniques using an optimal linear combination of features for data reduction were also evaluated.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1