Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Source Identification of Atlanta Aerosol by Positive Matrix Factorization

392

Citations

20

References

2003

Year

TLDR

The authors applied a bilinear positive matrix factorization (PMF) model to 662 fine‑particle and 685 coarse‑particle daily PM samples from Atlanta’s Jefferson Street site, using 26 and 15 compositional variables respectively, normalizing factor contributions with PMF‑apportioned masses and computing conditional probability functions with wind data. PMF revealed eight fine‑particle sources (SO₄²⁻‑rich secondary aerosol 56 %, motor vehicle 22 %, wood smoke 11 %, NO₃⁻‑rich secondary aerosol 7 %, cement kiln/OC mix 2 %, airborne soil 1 %, metal recycling 0.5 %, bus station/metal processing mix 0.3 %) and five coarse‑particle sources (airborne soil 60 %, NO₃⁻‑rich secondary aerosol 16 %, SO₄²⁻‑rich secondary aerosol 12 %, cement kiln 11 %, metal recycling 1 %), with results aligning with known local source locations.

Abstract

Data characterizing daily integrated particulate matter (PM) samples collected at the Jefferson Street monitoring site in Atlanta, GA, were analyzed through the application of a bilinear positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. A total of 662 samples and 26 variables were used for fine particle (particles ≤2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter) samples (PM2.5 ), and 685 samples and 15 variables were used for coarse particle (particles between 2.5 and 10 µm in aerodynamic diameter) samples (PM10–2.5 ). Measured PM mass concentrations and compositional data were used as independent variables. To obtain the quantitative contributions for each source, the factors were normalized using PMF-apportioned mass concentrations. For fine particle data, eight sources were identified: SO4 2−-rich secondary aerosol (56%), motor vehicle (22%), wood smoke (11%), NO3 −-rich secondary aerosol (7%), mixed source of cement kiln and organic carbon (OC) (2%), airborne soil (1%), metal recycling facility (0.5%), and mixed source of bus station and metal processing (0.3%). The SO4 2−-rich and NO3 −-rich secondary aerosols were associated with NH4 +. The SO4 2−-rich secondary aerosols also included OC. For the coarse particle data, five sources contributed to the observed mass: airborne soil (60%), NO3 −-rich secondary aerosol (16%), SO4 2−-rich secondary aerosol (12%), cement kiln (11%), and metal recycling facility (1%). Conditional probability functions were computed using surface wind data and identified mass contributions from each source. The results of this analysis agreed well with the locations of known local point sources.

References

YearCitations

Page 1