Scientific Methodologies in Medieval Islam

Jon McGinnis

Journal of the history of philosophy · 2003 · 149 citations · 8 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Ibn S�n critiqued induction as a source of absolute first principles, arguing it cannot guarantee necessity or primitiveness. The study examines Ibn S�n’s account of induction and experimentation. Ibn S�n developed a theory of experimentation that replaces absolute induction with conditional, necessary principles. This experimental theory contains elements resembling modern scientific method.

Abstract

The present study considers Ibn S�n�'s (Lat. Avicenna) account of induction (istiqra') and experimentation (tajriba). For Ibn S�n� induction purportedly provided the absolute, necessary and certain first principles of a science. Ibn S�n� criticized induction, arguing that it can neither guarantee the necessity nor provide the primitiveness required of first principles. In it place, Ibn S�n� developed a theory of experimentation, which avoids the pitfalls of induction by not providing absolute, but conditional, necessary and certain first principles. The theory of experimentation that emerges though not modern, does have elements that are similar to a modern conception of scientific method.

References

8