How to End an Orally-Derived Epic Poem

Adrian Kelly

Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) · 2007 · 65 citations · 39 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The article examines the endings of the Iliad, Odyssey, Works and Days, Theogony, and Shield of Herakles. The study argues that early Greek hexameter poetry uses doublet structures for closure and investigates the distribution and function of increasing doublets. The authors analyze increasing and decreasing doublets in the epic endings to demonstrate how they manipulate audience memory and emphasize preceding elements. The doublet strategy signals closure by highlighting scale disparity, discouraging expectation of continuation.

Abstract

This article argues that the extant works of early Greek hexameter poetry reveal a consistent strategy of closure, one that is based around the manipulation of doublet structure. The discussion begins by examining this well-known compositional technique, specifically the 'increasing' doublet (ID) where a smaller element is placed directly before a larger one, and it aims to demonstrate the widespread distribution and variety of these doublets, as well as their common function: to encourage the audience to summon their memory of the first element, and so augment the importance of the current, larger one. Attention is then turned to the endings themselves, in order, of the Iliad, Odyssey, Works and Days, Theogony and Shield of Herakles. Employing the same type of retrospective aesthetic, the poets use a 'decreasing' doublet (DD) to emphasize the greater significance of the prior, larger element. By directing the audience to this disparity in scale, the poets discourage them from expecting continuation, and so signal the close of their texts.

References

39