On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination

J. A. Scott Kelso, Carol A. Putnam, David Goodman

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · 1983 · 249 citations · 38 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study aims to explain interlimb coordination by modeling limbs as nonlinear oscillators. The authors model the limbs as qualitatively behaving like non‑linear oscillators. Across three experiments, they find that limbs coordinate as a unitary structure even when tasks differ in difficulty, that environmental constraints modulate both limbs’ space‑time behavior, and that this coordination preserves force partitioning and relative timing, indicating that many degrees of freedom temporarily function as a task‑specific coherent unit.

Abstract

In three experiments we show, using behavioural measures of movement outcome, as well as movement trajectory information and resultant kinematic profiles, that there is a strong tendency for the limbs to be co-ordinated as a unitary structure even under conditions where the movements are of disparate difficulty. Environmental constraints (an obstacle placed in the path of one limb, but not in the other) are shown to modulate the space-time behaviour of both limbs (Experiment II). Our results obtain for symmetrical (Experiment I) as well as asymmetrical movements that involve non-homologous muscle groups (Experiment III). These findings suggest that in multi-joint limb movements, the many degrees of freedom are organised to function temporarily as a single coherent unit that is uniquely specific to the task demands placed on it. For movements in general, and two-handed movements in particular, such units are revealed in a partitioning of the relevant force demands for each component (a force scaling characteristic) and a preservation of the internal “topology” of the action, as indexed by the relative timing among components. These features, as well as systematic deviations from perfect synchrony between the limbs can be rationalised by a model that assumes the limbs behave qualitatively like non-linear oscillators.

References

38