Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Notes on Early Positive Psychology (Psychofortology)

D. J. W. Strümpfer

South African Journal of Psychology · 2005 · 72 citations · 98 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Psychofortology, an alternative term for positive psychology, contrasts pathology with strength and traces its strengths paradigm back to ancient origins. The article briefly reviews contributions from the first eight decades of the twentieth century by psychologists and psychiatrists. The authors highlight about 40 pioneers—including James, Jung, Allport, Murray, Rogers, Frankl, Maslow, Csikszentmihalyi, and Antonovsky—and classify their concepts using Digman's higher‑order personality factors and spirituality. The review finds a predominance of personal‑growth concepts from the late 1950s to early 1970s and calls for greater attention to socialisation and interdependencies in fortological theory and research.

Abstract

Psychofortology is an alternative designation for positive psychology, and fortology (Latin fortis = strong) an antonym for pathology. The strengths paradigm has ancient origins. In this article brief reviews are presented of contributions made during the first eight decades of the twentieth century by mainly psychologists and psychiatrists. Among the most outstanding were James, Jung, Allport, Murray, Rogers, Frankl, Maslow, Csikszentmihalyi and Antonovsky; in all, some 40 forerunners are mentioned. By way of integration, their concepts are classified in terms of J. M. Digman's (1997) higher order personality factors a (socialisation process) and β (personal growth), as well as spirituality/religiousness. A preponderance of the personal growth category was noticeable, particularly from the late 1950s until the early 1970s. The relative neglect of socialisation and interdependencies deserves to be remedied in fortological theory and research.

References

98