International braz j urol · 2011 · 10 citations · 0 references
MedicineNephrologySurgeryKidney TransplantationTransplant SurgeryVascular SurgeryDeceased Donor Kidney TransplantationKidney SurgeryLaparoscopic NephrectomyLaparoscopic Renal SurgeryLiving Donor Kidney TransplantationRenal SurgeryKidney Vascular MappingRenal Artery ReconstructionRenal Transplant SurgeryRenal Vascular Surgery
Objectives: To compare the postoperative complications and survival metrics after multiple renal arteries (MRA) and single renal artery (SRA) laparoscopically procured living donor kidney transplantation (LL-DKT). MRA are the most frequently encountered anatomic variation during kidney transplantation. The longterm outcomes of LLDKT with MRA are not well characterized. Methods: A retrospective review of our institution's LLDKT database was performed. All surgeries were performed at a single tertiary care academic center between June 1999 and September 2008. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts (MRA vs. SRA), and analysis was limited to patients with at least 1-year follow-up. Results: Of 584 LLDKTs, 510 had at least 1-year follow-up (median: 36 months). A total of 393 grafts had an SRA, whereas 117 (23%) had MRA. When complications were stratified by the Clavien classification system, no differences were noted between groups (P = .5). Furthermore, rates of vascular (P = .2) and urological (P = .9) complications were similar between groups. There was, however, a higher incidence of slow graft function in the MRA group (P = .01), despite similar rates of delayed graft function (P = .9) and acute rejection (P = .4). Furthermore, allograft survival was similar between both groups with 76% of MRA and 81% of SRA grafts functioning at 5 years (P = .49). Patient overall survival was likewise similar between groups with 88% of MRA and 86% of SRA recipients surviving at 5 years (P = .76). Conclusions: Despite a higher incidence slow graft function, MRA in LLDKT does not adversely affect longterm allograft and patient overall survival.