Linguistics · 1999 · 184 citations · 14 references
Language StudiesLinguisticsHistorical LinguisticsMorphologySyntaxConstituent StructureFunctional SyntaxGrammarInflectional MorphologySentence StructureSyntactic AnalysisConfigurational TheoryDiachronic Syntactic TheoryGrammatical StructureLexical GrammarPrepositional Phrase StructurePrepositional SyntaxSyntactic StructuresX-bar Theory
Prepositions are traditionally viewed as a core lexical category yet share properties with both lexical and functional categories, and diachronically arise from the grammaticalization of verbs, nouns, and adjectives. The study analyzes how Latin and Romance prepositions evolve from adverbial particles, concluding that separating PP relational structure from configurational representation best models this diachronic trajectory. The authors argue that lexical‑functional grammar, with its distinction between f‑structure and c‑structure, better accounts for these changes than X‑bar theory, and suggest a possible role for optimality theory in formal accounts of syntactic change.
Within X-bar theory prepositions are standardly taken to constitute one of the core lexical categories along with verbs, nouns, and adjectives definable by the features [±V, ±N]. Synchronically, however they share properties with both lexical and functional categories, while diachronically they are usually the outcome of processes of grammaticalization affecting true lexical categories such as verbs, nouns, and adjectives. The present paper analyzes in detail the stages whereby prepositions in Latin and Romance evolve from earlier adverbial particles and concludes that this diachronic trajectory is best modeled within a framework that separates the relational structure of a PP from its configurational representation. It is argued that lexical-functional grammar, with its systematic distinction between f-structure and c-structure, provides a better account of these changes than conventional X-bar theory. In conclusion a possible role for optimality theory within a formal account of syntactic change is briefly sketched.
14
THE STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF CASE AND AGREEMENT
Maria Bittner, Ken Hale · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · 1996 · 794 citations · Full text
Does Grammaticalization Need Reanalysis?
Martín Haspelmath · Studies in Language · 1998 · 507 citations