Animal Science Journal · 2008 · 33 citations · 26 references
AgricultureDairy ScienceFarm ManagementLife Cycle AssessmentNutrient ManagementAgricultural Production SystemsAgricultural SustainabilityAgricultural SystemsCropping System SustainabilityDairy ProductionSilage ProductionAgricultural Life Cycle AssessmentArable FarmingEnergy Consumption
ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were to assess and compare the environmental impacts of two types of dairy farming systems, one of which makes use of whole‐crop rice silage and the other of which is conventional, using life cycle assessment (LCA). The functional unit was defined as 1 kg of 4% fat‐corrected milk (FCM). The processes associated with the dairy farming life cycle, such as feed production, feed transport, animal management including biological activity of the animal, and waste treatment were included within the system's boundaries. Environmental impacts of the rice silage‐using and conventional dairy farming systems were 987 and 972 g CO 2 equivalents for global warming, 6.87 and 7.13 g SO 2 equivalents for acidification, 1.19 and 1.23 g PO 4 equivalents for eutrophication, and 5.53 and 5.81 MJ for energy consumption, respectively. Our results suggest that the dairy farming system using rice silage in Japan has smaller environmental impacts for acidification, eutrophication, and energy consumption, and a larger impact for global warming compared with conventional farming. Further interpretation integrating these impact categories suggested 1.1% lower environmental impact of the rice silage‐using dairy farming system as a whole.
26
Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis
Richard N. Cooper, J. T. Houghton, James J. McCarthy et al. · Foreign Affairs · 2002 · 13K citations
Natural Sciences, Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences +14
A global high‐resolution emission inventory for ammonia
David S. Lee, W. A. H. Asman, Frank Dentener et al. · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · 1997 · 1.4K citations
Natural Sciences, Earth Sciences, Environmental Sciences +15