On the origin of semantic errors in naming: Evidence from the case of a global aphasic

David Howard, Virginia Orchard-lisle

Cognitive Neuropsychology · 1984 · 232 citations · 22 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study reports on a globally aphasic patient (JCU) and examines her semantic errors. The study investigates whether JCU’s semantic errors arise from incomplete semantic information during name retrieval and comprehension, rather than a lexical deficit. Four experiments were conducted to probe naming, phonemic cueing, word reading, and comprehension. She accurately judged non‑verbal semantic relations, but in naming only 49% of phonemic cues produced correct names, while incorrect cues generated frequent semantic errors that she rarely rejected; unrelated paraphasias were usually rejected, cued word reading produced fewer semantic errors, and in comprehension she correctly identified correct and unrelated names yet accepted more than half of the semantic components of correct names.

Abstract

Abstract The case of a globally aphasic patient (JCU) is reported. Four experiments are described. In the first, she was able to make correct non-verbal semantic judgements about pictures. In naming, correct phonemic cues elicited correct names for 49% of the pictures. Incorrect cues elicited a variety of errors; semantic errors were the most frequent, and they were not often rejected by JCU saying "no" immediately afterwards. Unrelated word paraphasias were usually rejected. Cued word reading was no worse than naming but there were many fewer semantic errors. In a comprehension task, JCU was able to judge that correct names were correct, and that unrelated names were inappropriate, but she judged more than 50% of semantic co-ordinates of the correct names to be correct. The nature of the processes responsible for her semantic errors is discussed, and it is argued that JCU is using incomplete semantic information in name retrieval and word comprehension, but that she does not have a deficit specific to any particular lexical items.

References

22