Publication | Open Access
Higher order local accuracy by averaging in the finite element method
280
Citations
14
References
1977
Year
Numerical AnalysisEngineeringVariational AnalysisMechanical EngineeringStructural OptimizationComputational MechanicsUniform SubdivisionFunctional AnalysisMath XmlnsNumerical ComputationIsogeometric AnalysisNumerical SimulationApproximation TheoryBoundary Element MethodVariational InequalitiesInterpolation SpaceInverse ProblemsNumerical Method For Partial Differential EquationFinite Element MethodElliptic EquationAnnotation Encoding=Multiscale Modeling
Let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="u Subscript h"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{u_h}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be a Ritz-Galerkin approximation, corresponding to the solution <italic>u</italic> of an elliptic boundary value problem, which is based on a uniform subdivision in the interior of the domain. In this paper we show that by "averaging" the values of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="u Subscript h"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{u_h}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> in the neighborhood of a point <italic>x</italic> we may (for a wide class of problems) construct an approximation to <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="u left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">u(x)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> which is often a better approximation than <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="u Subscript h Baseline left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{u_h}(x)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> itself. The "averaging" operator does not depend on the specific elliptic operator involved and is easily constructed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1