Journal of Mathematical Physics · 2008 · 385 citations · 36 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsOptimizationQuantum ComputingQuantum MechanicsApproximation MethodsQuantum AlgorithmsQuantum AnnealingQuantum ComputationQuantum ControlQuantum DynamicsAnnealing Schedule DesignConvergenceParameter ControlQuantum Adiabatic TheoremQuantum Annealing SimulationQuantum Optimal ControlQuantum Optimization AlgorithmsStochastic Dynamics
Quantum annealing uses quantum fluctuations to solve optimization problems, sharing ideas with quantum adiabatic evolution. The paper reviews the mathematical and theoretical foundation of quantum annealing. The authors present convergence theorems for infinite‑time quantum annealing under Schrödinger and stochastic dynamics, describe error‑reduction prescriptions for finite‑time evolution, and review the derivation of classical simulated annealing convergence from quantum adiabaticity. The study proves that identical asymptotic control‑parameter behavior ensures convergence for both Schrödinger and stochastic dynamics, and demonstrates that an optimized annealing schedule can significantly reduce errors without worsening computational complexity.
Quantum annealing is a generic name of quantum algorithms to use quantum-mechanical fluctuations to search for the solution of optimization problem. It shares the basic idea with quantum adiabatic evolution studied actively in quantum computation. The present paper reviews the mathematical and theoretical foundation of quantum annealing. In particular, theorems are presented for convergence conditions of quantum annealing to the target optimal state after an infinite-time evolution following the Schroedinger or stochastic (Monte Carlo) dynamics. It is proved that the same asymptotic behavior of the control parameter guarantees convergence both for the Schroedinger dynamics and the stochastic dynamics in spite of the essential difference of these two types of dynamics. Also described are the prescriptions to reduce errors in the final approximate solution obtained after a long but finite dynamical evolution of quantum annealing. It is shown there that we can reduce errors significantly by an ingenious choice of annealing schedule (time dependence of the control parameter) without compromising computational complexity qualitatively. A review is given on the derivation of the convergence condition for classical simulated annealing from the view point of quantum adiabaticity using a classical-quantum mapping.
36
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Scott Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, M.P. Vecchi · Science · 1983 · 44.6K citations
William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling et al. · 1994 · 15.4K citations