Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Three new datasets supporting use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) for children’s self-reports of pain intensity

569

Citations

14

References

2009

Year

TLDR

The NRS is widely used for child pain self‑report, yet validation evidence is lacking. The study aims to provide three datasets comparing the NRS with other pain scales in children. The authors compared NRS ratings to FPS‑R, VAS, and remembered immunization pain across three studies involving 69, 29, and 236 children, respectively. High correlations (r = 0.87–0.89) and similar score distributions demonstrate that the NRS is functionally equivalent to the FPS‑R and VAS for pain ≥1/10, supporting its use in children aged 8 and older, though further research on younger ages and standardized anchors is needed.

Abstract

Despite wide usage of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for self-report of pain intensity in clinical practice with children and adolescents, validation data are lacking. We present here three datasets from studies in which the NRS was used together with another self-report scale. Study A compared post-operative pain ratings on the NRS with scores on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) in 69 children age 7-17 years who had undergone a variety of surgical procedures. Study B compared post-operative pain ratings on the NRS with scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 29 children age 9-17 years who had undergone pectus excavatum repair. Study C compared ratings of remembered immunization pain in 236 children who comprised an NRS group and a sex- and age-matched VAS group. Correlations of the NRS with the FPS-R and VAS were r=0.87 and 0.89 in Studies A and B, respectively. In Study C, the distributions of scores on the NRS and VAS were very similar except that scores closest to the no pain anchor were more likely to be selected on the VAS than the NRS. The NRS can be considered functionally equivalent to the VAS and FPS-R except for very mild pain (<1/10). We conclude that use of the NRS is tentatively supported for clinical practice with children of 8years and older, and we recommend further research on the lower age limit and on standardized age-appropriate anchors and instructions for this scale.

References

YearCitations

Page 1