What Are Beall and Restall Pluralists About?Thanks to the attendees at the Western Canadian Philosophical Association Meetings of 2001 for a helpful discussion of this paper, and also to two anonymous referees for the AJP for their useful comments.

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Beall and Restall's claim that there is one true logic of metaphysical modality is incompatible with the formulation of logical pluralism that they give. I investigate various ways of reconciling their pluralism with this claim, but conclude that none of the options can be made to work.