Publication | Closed Access
The Child'S Acquisition of Regime Norms: Political Efficacy
312
Citations
19
References
1967
Year
Regime AnalysisLawPolitical BehaviorSocial SciencesFederalismDemocracyConversion ProcessGovernmental ProcessPolitical SystemsPolitical SystemState StructurePublic PolicyPolitical InteractionPolitical PowerPolitical PhysiologyChildren's RightPolitical PluralismPolitical DevelopmentPolitical OrganizationsRegime NormsPolitical ScienceConstitutional Order
A political system converts societal wants into binding decisions and requires a stable context of rules, norms, and authority structures—collectively a political regime or constitutional order—to function. The study hypothesizes that a persistent political system must secure at least minimal support for its regime. The mechanism posits that resolving disputes requires simultaneously agreeing on procedural settlement methods and substantive outcomes, a practically impossible dual task for continuous governance.
In its broadest conception, a political system is a means through which the wants of the members of a society are converted into binding decisions. To sustain a conversion process of this sort a society must provide a relatively stable context for political interaction, a set of ground rules for participating in all parts of the political process. We may describe this context variously as a constitutional order, a set of fundamental rules, or customary procedures for settling differences. But however this context is defined, it usually includes three elements: some minimal constraints on the general goals of its members, rules or norms governing behavior, and structures of authority through which the members of the system act in making and implementing political outputs. To these goals, norms and structures we may give the traditional name “political regime” or constitutional order in the broadest, nonlegal sense of the phrase. We may hypothesize that if a political system is to persist, one of its major tasks is to provide for the input of at least a minimal level of support for a regime of some kind. A political system that proved unable to sustain a regime, that is, some relatively ordered and stable way of converting inputs into outputs, could not avoid collapsing. Each time a dispute arose it would have to seek to agree on means for settling differences at the same time as it sought to bring about a settlement of the substance of the issue, a virtually impossible combination of tasks for a society to engage in continuously.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1