Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology · 2007 · 20 citations · 11 references
Hydrophilic AdditivesEngineeringPolyethylene GlycolPolymersChemical EngineeringPolymer MaterialPolymer TechnologyPolymer ProcessingPolymer ChemistryMigratory AdditivesMaterials SciencePolymer EngineeringSurface ModificationPolymer AnalysisPolymer ScienceSurface SciencePolymer CharacterizationPolymer AdditiveLinear Additives
Abstract Linear and branched hydrophilic additives of various molecular weights (MWs) were extruded with polypropylene (PP) to make blend films. The surface‐modifying additives included polyethylene glycol (PEG), hydroxyl‐terminated four‐arm polyethylene oxide (PEO), and a commercial hydrophilic additive, Irgasurf HL560. Films were extruded by using a twin‐screw microcompounder at 200°C, and the resulting film thickness was 100 μm. Attenuated total reflectance (ATR)‐FTIR spectrometry and water contact angle measurements were performed on the film surfaces over time to investigate the additive migration behavior. Although ATR‐FTIR detected concentration increases for all additives in the subsurface region, there was no significant improvement in surface hydrophilicity for the PEGs and four‐arm PEOs in the same period of time as water contact angles were measured on the surfaces. Among the linear additives, low MW PEG (1 kDa) was found to migrate faster than the high MW varieties. The linear PEG and four‐arm PEO with MW higher than 2 kDa did not exhibit significant migration to the surface within a month. Irgasurf was found to change the surface wettability effectively in a relatively short time. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 13:57–64, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers.
11