The Psychological Impact of Being Screened for Anal Cancer in HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex With Men

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anal cancer screening may be considered in HIV-infected men who have sex with men because they are at increased risk. Cancer screening can provoke anxiety, which may lead to poorer screening compliance. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the psychological consequences of anal cancer screening in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. DESIGN: This investigation is a prospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted in primary and tertiary care HIV clinics in Toronto, Canada. PATIENTS: One hundred four HIV-infected men who have sex with men were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: : Psychological impact was measured at 4 time points (before screening, after screening, after receiving results, and before follow-up) using the Impact of Events Scale, the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale, and the Psychological Consequences Questionnaire. RESULTS: Median age was 44, 77% were receiving antiretroviral therapy, and 11% had high-grade anal dysplasia (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3). Fifteen to 32% of the patients reported high levels of negative psychological consequences across the 4 time points; the highest levels occurred at time 2. Higher HIV symptom count and baseline level of negative impact were significantly associated with higher Impact of Events scores, whereas younger age and a higher baseline level of negative impact were significantly associated with higher scores with use of the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Anal cancer screening is not associated with greater adverse psychological impact in most HIV-infected men who have sex with men. Younger patients, those with more HIV-related symptoms and greater baseline psychological distress, are at risk for increased psychological distress during screening.