AIAA Journal · 1975 · 17 citations · 4 references
ComputingComputational EngineeringPhysicsAcousticsComputational AcousticsComputational MechanicsAcoustic ModelingAcoustic SimulationAcoustic Wave PropagationNumerical AcousticsPhysical AcousticsRandom VibrationExcitationFinite Difference SchemesPeak Structural ResponsePower Spectral DensityPower Spectral Density AnalysisStationary Random ProcessesStochastic Process AnalysisWave Propagation Modeling
Conclusion Compared to the rigorous procedures the solution to the previously stated problem, given by Eqs. (4) and (5) is approximate, but avoids the cumbersome calculations involved in the former. In this connection, the stochastic analysis of a single degree of freedom system subjected to random wind and seismic excitations to study the response characteristics was undertaken by the authors. The exciting force was assumed to be nonstationary in character, and was represented by the product of a deterministic shape function and a stationary random process characterized by its power spectral density. The choice of deterministic function and power spectral density was based on certain characteristics observed in a large number of past records of excitation process. The application of Eqs. (4) and (5) to study the peak response characteristics of the system revealed that the probability estimates for various appropriate values of X are about 0.5% below those obtained by an exact procedure.
4
Willard L. Miranker, Eugene Isaacson, Herbert B. Keller · Mathematics of Computation · 1967 · 1.9K citations
片山 幸久 · Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan · 1995 · 531 citations · Full text