Antipode · 2007 · 448 citations · 55 references
Social SciencesEnvironmental PolicyEnvironmental GovernanceEnvironmental PoliticsPolitical EconomyEnvironmental Political PhilosophyEnvironmental ProtectionGlobal Environmental GovernanceCommodification Of Natural ResourcesEcological RightsEnvironmental Claims On Food LabelsNeoliberal DiscourseProperty Rights AnalysisProperty Rights CritiqueRights To Natural Resources
Voluntary food labels are portrayed as resistance to neoliberalization by protecting resources, yet they also function as property rights that enable market trade. The study investigates how these labels operationalize neoliberal governance, the barriers they create, their distributional impacts, and potential political openings. By reviewing Polanyian theory, the paper analyzes the operationalization of labels, the differing entry barriers they impose, and their use of market mechanisms to generate new markets. The analysis shows that the labels concede market regulation, employ tools to create markets where none existed, and may generate political openings beyond their immediate effects.
Abstract: Voluntary food labels that express ecological, social, and/or place‐based values have been posed as an important form of resistance to neoliberalization in the Polanyian sense of protecting land, other natural resources, and labor from the ravages of the market. At the same time, these labels are in some respects analogs to the very things they are purported to resist, namely property rights that allow these ascribed commodities to be traded in a global market. After reviewing the Polanyian claims about these labels, the paper examines how these labels are operationalized and notes important differences in the sort of barriers to entry they erect, which in turn have quite different distributional consequences. It then goes on to discuss how these labels look to be an expression of roll‐out neoliberalization. Following Heynen and Robbins who note four dominant aspects of neoliberalization of environmental governance (governance, privatization, enclosure, and valuation), to which a fifth (devolution) is added, the paper shows how these labels not only concede the market as the locus of regulation, but in keeping with neoliberalism's fetish of market mechanisms, they employ tools designed to create markets where none previously existed. In recognition that neoliberal political economies and subjectivities have delimited the possible, the paper also grapples with how these labels may produce political openings outside of their most proximate effects.
55
Governmentality: power and rule in modern society
Choice Reviews Online · 2010 · 6.2K citations
The Tools of government: a guide to the new governance
Choice Reviews Online · 2002 · 1.8K citations
Public Affairs, Public Administration, Public Governance +15