Annals of Surgery · 2007 · 80 citations · 19 references
MedicineMedical EducationSurgeryGeneral SurgeryHealth Services ResearchResidency TrainingSurgery EducationSurgical ResidencySurgical Resource UtilizationResearch FellowshipsResidency FundingResident Surgical EducationSurgical Workforce Development
In Brief Objective: To determine whether dedicated research time during surgical residency leads to funding following postgraduate training. Summary Background Data: Unlike other medical specialties, a significant number of general surgery residents spend 1 to 3 years in dedicated laboratory research during their training. The impact this has on obtaining peer reviewed research funding after residency is unknown. Methods: Survey of all graduates of an academic general surgery resident program from 1990 to 2005 (n = 105). Results: Seventy-five (71%) of survey recipients responded, of which 66 performed protected research during residency. Fifty-one currently perform research (mean effort, 26%; range, 2%–75%). Twenty-three respondents who performed research during residency (35%) subsequently received independent faculty funding. Thirteen respondents (20%) obtained NIH grants following residency training. The number of papers authored during resident research was associated with obtaining subsequent faculty grant support (9.3 vs. 5.2, P = 0.02). Faculty funding was associated with obtaining independent research support during residency (42% vs. 17%, P = 0.04). NIH-funded respondents spent more combined years in research before and during residency (3.7 vs. 2.8, P = 0.02). Academic surgeons rated research fellowships more relevant to their current job than private practitioners (4.3 vs. 3.4 by Likert scale, P < 0.05). Both groups considered research a worthwhile use of their time during residency (4.5 vs. 4.1, P = not significant). Conclusions: A large number of surgical trainees who perform a research fellowship in the middle of residency subsequently become funded investigators in this single-center survey. The likelihood of obtaining funding after residency is related to productivity and obtaining grant support during residency as well as cumulative years of research prior to obtaining a faculty position. This study examines the impact of spending 1 to 3 years of laboratory research during surgical residency on subsequent faculty funding, by surveying graduates of a residency program from 1990 to 2005. Thirty-five percent obtained independent funding, and 20% received NIH funding. Productivity and funding during residency and total years of research training predicted faculty funding.
19
Central Challenges Facing the National Clinical Research Enterprise
Nancy S. Sung, William F. Crowley, Myron Genel et al. · JAMA · 2003 · 1.2K citations
The Physician-Scientist Career Pipeline in 2005
Timothy J. Ley, León E. Rosenberg · JAMA · 2005 · 362 citations