Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2000 · 34 citations · 16 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyComputed TomographyHepatobiliary ImagingLiver Blood FlowLiver ImagingAbdominal Aorta ImagingContrast Agent AdministrationHepatocellular Carcinoma ImagingLiver Lesion DetectionLiver Tumor ImagingScan Speed
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to assess the scan delay and the effect of flow rates on arterial phase scanning of hepatic CT. METHOD: One hundred twenty patients suspected of having hepatocellular carcinoma were examined by three-phase helical CT using computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology. We set the region of interest (ROI) in the abdominal aorta at the level of the celiac artery as a baseline. The triggering threshold was set at 100 HU. A volume of 100 ml of iomeprol (350 mg of I/ml) was administered at 2, 2.5, or 3 ml/s i.v. RESULTS: In all cases, helical CT scanning began after reaching the ROI threshold. Then, portal venous phase scanning was initiated 50 s after arterial phase initiation. The mean delay time from the initiation of contrast agent administration to the beginning of arterial phase scanning was 29.2 +/- 3.8 s (mean +/- SD, range 22-39 s). A faster injection rate significantly shortened the scan delay (p < 0.01). In portal venous phase scanning, calculated areas under the hepatic enhancement curves were almost equal among different injection rates. CONCLUSION: The computer-assisted bolus-tracking technology is a useful method for determining an individual scan delay of arterial phase CT.
16
James H. Oliver, R L Baron, Michael P. Federle et al. · American Journal of Roentgenology · 1996 · 160 citations
Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase.
V M Bonaldi, P M Bret, Caroline Reinhold et al. · Radiology · 1995 · 155 citations
Geum Joo Hwang, Myeong‐Jin Kim, Han Soo Yoo et al. · Radiology · 1997 · 131 citations · Full text