SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2002 · 42 citations · 11 references
EngineeringMaterials EngineeringPetroleum EngineeringFormation EvaluationOffshore StructuresProduction EngineeringMaterials For Subsea PipelinesMultiphase Flow In PipelinesOffshore Pipeline EngineeringSubsea PipelinesWax DepositionParaffin Deposition MechanismsParaffin MitigationWax Deposition ControlWax Deposition In PipelinesWax Deposition ModelingWax Deposition PredictionWax Deposition SimulationWax Precipitation
Abstract Control of paraffin deposition is addressed in early phase of new field developments, as part of the fluid-related effects on the flow performance of the multiphase transportation system. Paraffins are precipitated by a decrease of the fluid temperature. During the design phase, a combination of experiments and modeling is used to predict potential wax related problems and determine possible solutions for wax control. High reliability is required from wax deposition models in order to avoid over protective operational guidelines, over design of the transportation system and thereby reduce cost in terms of insulation, pigging and chemical injection. The main objective of this study is to compare wax deposition predicted by a simulation model to operational data for two different North Sea fields. The first case contemplates a 10-inch, approximately 21 km long multiphase and subsea production pipeline from the High Pressure gas condensate field A to the central gas-processing complex. The production has now come to an end. The second case is a single phase, stabilized oil being transported through a 16 inch, approximately 43 km production pipeline from a processing platform at field B to field C for storage and offloading. OLGA 2000 with wax module has been used for the dynamic wax deposition simulations. The physical and thermodynamic fluid properties used in the simulations are also presented and discussed. Various model parameters and their influence on modeling results are evaluated. Field experience after many years of production is available from the gas condensate field A. Although wax deposition was predicted in the gas condensate line, no significant deposit has ever been observed. Wax control for the field B pipeline is currently based on regular pigging every few days combined with continuous injection of wax inhibitor. There has not been sufficient field data available for a very detailed comparison with modeling results. Anyway, operational experience from two very different fields gives some important insight into the strengths and weaknesses of current modeling tools and practice. A main conclusion of this paper is that wax deposition under field conditions seems to be less severe than predicted by the model for the multiphase gas condensate line, while it seems to be reasonable agreement between modeling and field experience for the single-phase oil case.
11