Biotropica · 2005 · 78 citations · 48 references
Life SciencesBiologyEvolutionary BiologyEvolutionary EcologyInsect EcologyInsect EvolutionEvolution Of FlowersFloral MorphologyFloral TraitsInsect PhylogenyPlant-pollinator InteractionsPollination BiologyFloral Morphology EvolutionFloral Nectar SpursNectar Resource AvailabilityNectar Spur EvolutionNectary EvolutionNectary MorphologyPhylogenetic Independent ContrastsPollinator Behavior Evolution
ABSTRACT I examined relationships between tongue length of orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) and nectar spur length of their flowers in the genera Calathea , Costus , and Dimerocostus using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Long‐tubed flowers have specialized on one or several species of long‐tongued euglossine bees, but long‐tongued bees have not specialized on long‐tubed flowers. Whereas long tongues may have evolved to provide access to a wider variety of nectar resources, long nectar spurs may be a mechanism for flowers to conserve nectar resources while remaining attractive to traplining bee visitors.
48
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Joseph Felsenstein · The American Naturalist · 1985 · 10.1K citations
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks
Jordi Bascompte, Pedro Jordano, Carlos J. Melián et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2003 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +17
Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters
Nikolas M. Waser, Lars Chıttka, Mary V. Price et al. · Ecology · 1996 · 1.9K citations
Agriculture, Biology, Plant Sciences +17