Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology · 1998 · 150 citations · 16 references
MedicineOtolaryngologySurgeryImplant SurgeryLaryngologyReconstructive Neck SurgeryLaryngeal ReconstructionLaryngeal SurgeryVocal Fold ParalysisVoice RehabilitationVoice SurgeryLaryngeal ParalysisMedialization LaryngoplastyStandardized Assessment InstrumentsUnilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis ManagementVocal Fold AugmentationVocal Fold FunctionVocal Fold MedializationVocal Fold Surgery
Unilateral laryngeal paralysis can be treated by various surgical techniques that stabilize the paralyzed vocal fold in a median position to improve glottic function. The study describes a new ePTFE medialization laryngoplasty technique and reports outcomes in 16 patients. The technique uses an ePTFE implant without special instrumentation, allows incremental adjustment of vocal fold position, and its voice outcomes were assessed pre‑ and postoperatively by four observers with a standardized four‑point scale. No surgical or implant complications occurred, and voice grade improved from 2.3 to 1.1 while breathiness improved from 2.0 to 0.4, yielding good to excellent results.
Symptomatic unilateral laryngeal paralysis may be treated successfully by a wide variety of surgical techniques. These techniques share the concept that stabilization of the paralyzed vocal fold in a median position will improve glottic function. Medialization laryngoplasty with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) incorporates the general principles of established medialization procedures, yet is unique in its simplicity. The technique does not require special instrumentation, employs incremental adjustment of vocal fold position, and utilizes an implantable material with a long history of patient safety. We describe this new technique and report on the outcome of our first 16 patients treated. No surgical or implant-related complications have occurred. Voice results were measured from preoperative and postoperative video and voice recordings by four independent observers using a standardized assessment tool. Voice grade and breathiness were evaluated on a four-point scale (0 = normal and 3 = abnormal, extreme). The mean overall grade improved from 2.3 ± 0.6 to 1.1 ± 0.6, and breathiness from 2.0 ± 0.8 to 0.4 ± 0.4. The technique is simple, the implant material has been in clinical use for decades, and the voice results are good to excellent.
16