Temporal Patterns of Fruit Fly (Drosophila) Evolution Revealed by Mutation Clocks

Koichiro Tamura

Molecular Biology and Evolution · 2003 · 608 citations · 41 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Drosophila melanogaster has long served as a model organism, yet the timing of its major speciation events remains unclear because fossil records are sparse and traditional molecular clocks show non‑clock‑like substitution patterns. The study aims to develop a new method that uses genomic mutation distances to construct a reliable fruit‑fly molecular time scale. The method analyzes 2,977 pairwise comparisons from 176 nuclear genes to derive a mutation clock. The analysis yields a long‑term mutation clock of 11.1 mutations per kilobase per million years and dates key speciation events, with estimates aligning with fossil evidence and reflecting Cenozoic climate‑driven habitat fragmentation.

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster has been a canonical model organism to study genetics, development, behavior, physiology, evolution, and population genetics for nearly a century. Despite this emphasis and the completion of its nuclear genome sequence, the timing of major speciation events leading to the origin of this fruit fly remain elusive because of the paucity of extensive fossil records and biogeographic data. Use of molecular clocks as an alternative has been fraught with non-clock-like accumulation of nucleotide and amino-acid substitutions. Here we present a novel methodology in which genomic mutation distances are used to overcome these limitations and to make use of all available gene sequence data for constructing a fruit fly molecular time scale. Our analysis of 2977 pairwise sequence comparisons from 176 nuclear genes reveals a long-term fruit fly mutation clock ticking at a rate of 11.1 mutations per kilobase pair per Myr. Genomic mutation clock–based timings of the landmark speciation events leading to the evolution of D. melanogaster show that it shared most recent common ancestry 5.4 MYA with D. simulans, 12.6 MYA with D. erecta+D. orena, 12.8 MYA with D. yakuba+D. teisseri, 35.6 MYA with the takahashii subgroup, 41.3 MYA with the montium subgroup, 44.2 MYA with the ananassae subgroup, 54.9 MYA with the obscura group, 62.2 MYA with the willistoni group, and 62.9 MYA with the subgenus Drosophila. These and other estimates are compatible with those known from limited biogeographic and fossil records. The inferred temporal pattern of fruit fly evolution shows correspondence with the cooling patterns of paleoclimate changes and habitat fragmentation in the Cenozoic.

References

41