Publication | Closed Access
The Human Skin as a Source of Mima-Herellea Infections
105
Citations
10
References
1963
Year
Pathogenic MicrobiologyBacteriologyDifferent NamesDermatologyBacterial PathogensMicrobial EvolutionMicrobial EcologyNew OrganismsNew TribeAerobic CulturingParasitologyHealth SciencesDermatopathologyClinical MicrobiologyGram-negative BacteriologyMicrobial SystematicsMicrobiologyHuman SkinMedicineMicrobial Genetics
BACTERIA of the<i>Mima-Herellea</i>group were not recognized as distinct and remained undescribed until 1942, when De Bord<sup>1</sup>suggested the name<i>Mimeae</i>for a new tribe of gram-negative, nonmotile organisms which resembled Neisseria morphologically, but differed in biochemical characteristics. He named the two new organisms<i>Mima polymorpha</i>and<i>Herellea vaginicola.</i> During subsequent years, other authors reported similar organisms but gave them different names so that the situation became extremely confusing. Synonyms for bacteria in this group include "B5W,"<sup>2</sup><i>Bacterium anitratum</i>,<sup>3</sup><i>Moraxella glucidolytica</i>,<sup>4</sup><i>Achromobacter lwoffi</i>,<sup>5</sup>and<i>Acinetobacter anitratum</i>.<sup>6</sup>Reviews of the literature are given by Rosebury in 1962<sup>7</sup>and Daly et al in 1962.<sup>8</sup> Presumably due to the uncertain taxonomic position of these bacteria, they were not included in the seventh edition of<i>Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology</i>. This, combined with the confusing variety of synonyms, resulted in failure to identify this group
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1