International Journal of Aviation Psychology · 2005 · 30 citations · 15 references
Public HealthBiostatisticsPsychologyExperimental DesignExperimental PsychologyMeta-analysisEffect Size EstimationModerator AnalysisEffect SizeEffect Size AnalysisEstimate VarianceSampling ErrorSampling Error VarianceSimulation EffectivenessWithin-study Variance
A meta-analytic (MA) approach was used to generate an estimate of true mean effect size (δ) for simulator motion with regard to pilot training transfer. The analysis was based on the techniques developed by Hunter and Schmidt (1990). A d statistic was used for effect size calculations based on information available in the included sources. Eleven studies were reviewed and considered for analysis, but only seven of these included the information necessary for calculating effect size and were included in the study. The result of the MA suggest a small, positive effect for motion, d = .16. No credibility interval could be built around this estimate of population mean effect size because the resulting sampling error variance was larger than the observed variance in d across the assessed studies. This led to a negative variance estimate for δ and subsequently an estimated SDδ of 0. These results suggest that simulator motion has a small, positive effect on pilot training transfer and contradict an earlier MA on the same subject. The small sample size (few studies) and methodological shortcomings within the included studies require that the findings be interpreted cautiously. Alternative interpretations and their implications for the aviation training community are discussed.
15
Eduardo Salas, Clint Bowers, Lori Rhodenizer · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · 1998 · 291 citations · Full text
Education, Behavioral Sciences, Competency-based Education +14