Publication | Closed Access
Stability and accuracy of finite element methods for flow acoustics. II: Two‐dimensional effects
17
Citations
9
References
2005
Year
Numerical AnalysisAeroacousticsEngineeringFluid MechanicsMechanical EngineeringComputational MechanicsMechanics ModelingEngineering AcousticNumerical SimulationAcoustical EngineeringSound PropagationDeformation ModelingAcoustic AnalysisDispersion PropertiesBoundary Element MethodHealth SciencesOcean Wave MechanicsTwo‐dimensional EffectsFinite Element MethodsHydromechanicsNumerical AnisotropyShip HydrodynamicsMixed Galbrun FormulationFinite Element MethodFlow AcousticsComputational Acoustics
Abstract This is the second of two articles that focus on the dispersion properties of finite element models for acoustic propagation on mean flows. We consider finite element methods based on linear potential theory in which the acoustic disturbance is modelled by the convected Helmholtz equation, and also those based on a mixed Galbrun formulation in which acoustic pressure and Lagrangian displacement are used as discrete variables. The current paper focuses on the effects of numerical anisotropy which are associated with the orientation of the propagating wave to the mean flow and to the grid axes. Conditions which produce aliasing error in the Helmholtz formulation are of particular interest. The 9‐noded Lagrangian element is shown to be superior to the more commonly used 8‐noded serendipity element. In the case of the Galbrun elements, the current analysis indicates that isotropic meshes generally reduce numerical error of triangular elements and that higher order mixed quadrilaterals are generally less effective than an equivalent mesh of lower order triangles. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1