Anesthesia & Analgesia · 2008 · 177 citations · 20 references
MedicinePerioperative MedicineSurgeryAnesthesiaCardiothoracic SurgeryPerioperative PharmacologyTranexamic Acid UseValve Surgery AnesthesiaAntifibrinolytic AgentsHigh-risk Surgical PatientsTranexamic Acid AdministrationValve Repair Surgery
In Brief BACKGROUND: Our aim was to investigate postoperative complications and mortality after administration of aprotinin compared to tranexamic acid in an unselected, consecutive cohort. METHODS: Perioperative data from consecutive cardiac surgery patients were prospectively collected between September 2005 and June 2006 in a university-affiliated clinic (n = 1188). During the first 5 mo, 596 patients received aprotinin (Group A); in the next 5 mo, 592 patients were treated with tranexamic acid (Group T). Except for antifibrinolytic therapy, the anesthetic and surgical protocols remained unchanged. RESULTS: The pre- and intraoperative variables were comparable between the treatment groups. Postoperatively, a significantly higher incidence of seizures was found in Group T (4.6% vs 1.2%, P < 0.001). This difference was also significant in the primary valve surgery and the high risk surgery subgroups (7.9% vs 1.2%, P = 0.003; 7.3% vs 2.4%, P = 0.035, respectively). Persistent atrial fibrillation (7.9% vs 2.3%, P = 0.020) and renal failure (9.7% vs 1.7%, P = 0.002) were also more common in Group T, in the primary valve surgery subgroup. On the contrary, among primary coronary artery bypass surgery patients, there were more acute myocardial infarctions and renal dysfunction in Group A (5.8% vs 2.0%, P = 0.027; 22.5% vs 15.2%, P = 0.036, respectively). The 1-yr mortality was significantly higher after aprotinin treatment in the high risk surgery group (17.7% vs 9.8%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSION: Both antifibrinolytic drugs bear the risk of adverse outcome depending on the type of cardiac surgery. Administration of aprotinin should be avoided in coronary artery bypass graft and high risk patients, whereas administration of tranexamic acid is not recommended in valve surgery. IMPLICATIONS: Tranexamic acid is associated with complications after valve surgery; aprotinin is coupled with complications after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. One-year mortality is significantly increased after aprotinin administration in patients undergoing high risk cardiac surgery. According to our results, aprotinin should not be used in coronary artery bypass graft and high risk patients, whereas administration of tranexamic acid is not recommended for valvular heart surgery.
20
EFFECT OF APROTININ ON NEED FOR BLOOD TRANSFUSION AFTER REPEAT OPEN-HEART SURGERY
David Royston, Kenneth M. Taylor, Benjamin P. Bidstrup et al. · The Lancet · 1987 · 691 citations