Combined Hepatocyte-selective and Blood-Pool Contrast Agents for the CT Detection of Experimental Liver Tumors in Rabbits

Jamey P. Weichert, Fred T. Lee, Susan G. Chosy, Marc A. Longino, Janet E. Kuhlman, Dennis M. Heisey, Glen Leverson

Radiology · 2000 · 46 citations · 18 references

Concepts

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the imaging characteristics of a new computed tomographic (CT) contrast material with both hepatocyte-selective and blood-pool components (iodinated triglyceride (ITG)-dual) versus standard iohexol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: VX2 carcinoma was inoculated in seven rabbits. Animals underwent nonenhanced, iohexol-enhanced (600 mg of iodine per kilogram of body weight), and ITG-dual-enhanced (blood-pool moiety, 100 mg of iodine per kilogram; hepatocyte-selective moiety, 100 or 200 mg of iodine per kilogram, injected 90 minutes apart) helical CT. Livers were removed, preserved in formalin, suspended in agar, and sectioned transversely at 3-mm intervals. Attenuation values for normal liver and tumors were obtained, and blinded readers evaluated images for lesions by using a modified free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method. RESULTS: A total of 47 separate tumor sites were detected at pathologic examination. ITG-dual-enhanced scans obtained with 300 mg of iodine per kilogram demonstrated similar liver opacification to iohexol-enhanced scans obtained with 600 mg of iodine per kilogram, but with less lesion enhancement, which resulted in better liver-to-lesion contrast. Blinded readers had a higher sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve for ITG-dual-enhanced scans as compared with iohexol-enhanced scans (P: <.01). CONCLUSION: ITG-dual-enhanced CT quantitatively and qualitatively improved liver lesion detection versus iohexol-enhanced CT. Future clinical trials with various human tumor types after potential approval for human use are needed to determine the ultimate role of this or other dual-mechanism contrast materials.

References

18