International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2003 · 13 citations · 5 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringAerodynamicsComputational Fluid DynamicsFluid DynamicsComputational AerodynamicsLow-speed AerodynamicsTurbulenceTurbulent FlowTurbulent TransportJetsPreconditioningTurbulence Closure ModelsTurbulence Closure SchemesTurbulence ModelingTurbulence ModellingVortex Flow
Abstract This second segment of the two‐part paper systematically examines several turbulence models in the context of two flows, namely a vortex flow created by an inclined jet in crossflow, and the flow field in a diffusing S‐shaped duct. The test cases are chosen on the basis of availability of high‐quality and detailed experimental data. The tested turbulence models are integrated to solid surfaces and consist of: Rodi's two‐layer k–ε model, Wilcox's k–ω model, Menter's two‐equation shear–stress‐transport model, and the one‐equation model of Spalart and Allmaras. The objective of the study is to establish the prediction accuracy of these turbulence models with respect to three‐dimensional separated flows with streamline curvature. At the same time, the study establishes the minimum spatial resolution requirements for each of these turbulence closures, and identifies the proper low‐Mach‐number preconditioning and artificial diffusion settings of a Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes algorithm for optimum rate of convergence and minimum adverse impact on prediction accuracy. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
5