Illegal Migration and US Immigration Reform: A Conceptual Framework

Michael P. Todaro, Lydia Maruszko

Population and Development Review · 1987 · 290 citations · 8 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The model posits that illegal migration decisions depend on expected income differentials—including wages, unemployment, probability of capture/deportation, and wage discrimination—making it responsive to variables largely absent in legal migration analyses. This paper introduces a conceptual framework for analyzing international illegal migration from developing countries. Using a simulation of Mexico–US migration, the framework evaluates the 1986 Simpson‑Rodino Immigration Reform Act’s impact via employer penalties and increased border apprehension. The simulation identifies major weaknesses in the legislation. Authors: (authors).

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing international illegal migration from developing countries. The model postulates that the decision to migrate is some function of the expected income differential between the home and destination countries where this differential comprises not only home and destination wage and unemployment rates but also 2 new variables unique to decision making by illegal migrants--the probability of capture and deportation and the degree of wage discrimination against illegal workers. The model implies that illegal migration responds to a variety of economic and noneconomic variables that are either negligible or nonexistent in an analysis of internal domestic and legal international migration. Through a simulation that reflects the current environment in which illegal migration from Mexico into the US takes place the model is used to evaluate the impact of the 1986 Simpson-Rodino Immigration Reform and Control Act designed to curb the inflow of illegal migrants through the imposition of employer penalties and increased border apprehension. The simulation reveals some major weaknesses of the legislation. (authors)

References

8