IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · 2010 · 422 citations · 49 references
Numerical AnalysisRedundant RepresentationsSparse RepresentationImage AnalysisMachine LearningConjugate GradientEngineeringL1-l2 OptimizationMultidimensional Signal ProcessingTraditional Optimization TechniquesConvex OptimizationAtomic DecompositionInverse ProblemsComputer ScienceImage EnhancementSignal ProcessingLinear Optimization
Sparse, redundant representations offer a powerful emerging model for signals. This model approximates a data source as a linear combination of few atoms from a prespecified and over-complete dictionary. Often such models are fit to data by solving mixed ¿ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</sub> -¿ <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> convex optimization problems. Iterative-shrinkage algorithms constitute a new family of highly effective numerical methods for handling these problems, surpassing traditional optimization techniques. In this article, we give a broad view of this group of methods, derive some of them, show accelerations based on the sequential subspace optimization (SESOP), fast iterative soft-thresholding algorithm (FISTA) and the conjugate gradient (CG) method, present a comparative performance, and discuss their potential in various applications, such as compressed sensing, computed tomography, and deblurring.
49
David L. Donoho · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2006 · 22.8K citations
Bradley Efron, Trevor Hastie, Iain M. Johnstone et al. · The Annals of Statistics · 2004 · 9.4K citations · Full text