Journal of Semitic Studies · 2003 · 21 citations · 0 references
HumanitiesClassicsReligious StudiesBiblical StudiesHistorical LinguisticsMedieval LiteratureBiblical HebrewHebrew LanguageHebrew LiteraturePentateuch StudiesPentateuchal StudiesSacred TextsBiblical Hebrew Textual LinguisticsConsonantal FeaturesEarly Biblical HebrewHebrew Historical LinguisticsMasoretic Manuscript TraditionMasoretic Text ComparisonMasoretic VocalizationScriptural Tradition
The use of the Hebrew article underwent changes throughout the history of Biblical Hebrew. Some of these changes are documented by the differences between the consonantal framework and the Masoretic vocalization. A comparative view of these materials and the respective variants in the Samaritan Pentateuch including its reading tradition provides further insights. With regard to the use of the article, the consonantal framework of the Masoretic text preserves the oldest stratum, while the Masoretic vocalization represents the youngest. The Samaritan tradition, on the other hand, is uniform in both its parts — consonantal framework and reading tradition — and holds a middle position between the two Masoretic strata from a historical point of view. However, both parts of the Masoretic tradition share at least one common feature, which set it as a whole apart from the Samaritan tradition: the generic use of the article.